Pity Rolling Stone’s social media editor. Wednesday was not a good day for the venerable rock title as at least six retailers with strong New England ties vowed not to carry the current issue of the magazine. Splashed across its cover was what many considered to be a too-glamorous image of the accused Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
Online, Rolling Stone would very much like to change the conversation from its poor taste. Yesterday, the magazine’s Facebook page glibly asked readers to list their favorite Ramones song, listen to a new Earth, Wind & Fire single and read up on Bono’s latest good deeds. Each post was met with more howls of out rage than the last … until, finally, a backlash against the backlash reared its head.
It started straightforward enough, with a note to say the staff’s “hearts go out to the victims of the Boston Marathon bombing.” That sentiment was rewarded with insightful comments like “you suck”:
Perhaps a little too soon, the magazine decided to deflect attention away, toward Bono’s good deeds. Nothing controversial to see here, just a beautiful Irishman’s beautiful Samaritanism! Top response: “maybe you should put him on the cover.”
The magazine didn’t have much more luck in alerting readers to rockers Kings of Leon’s new single …
… nor for that matter, Earth, Wind & Fire’s (props to them, anyway, for attempting to appeal to multiple demographics).
A post about Riff Raff was met with a call to boycott the magazine.
And a callout for favorite Ramones songs was met with a list of retailers that had banned the issue.
But it leaves one wondering how many of these very, very angry Facebook posters had actually read the article. It leaves one wondering what else is going on in their lives (or not going on in their lives) to lead them to repeatedly troll the magazine’s Facebook page. When people started ganging up on this post about the Emmy nominations, the backlash against the backlash finally, well, lashed back. “Oh lord, please stop banging on about the terrorist cover,” wrote one popular commenter:
And negative comments about this Jane Lynch post yielded this popular reply: “How bout you all unfollow RS if you’re just gonna bitch. Dumbasses.”
But what we at Digiday really want to know is this: Where was all this disgust (real, manufactured or other) when this was Rolling Stone’s cover?
Image via Shutterstock
Digiday+ Research: The economy will hit the media and marketing industries this year, but differently
The economy will plague both the media and marketing industries in 2023, but the hit will be uneven between publishers and agencies.
Podcast ad buyers have yet to see a slowdown
Ad buyers have yet to see clients cut their podcast budgets – though the time of podcasts as the shiny new medium may be coming to an end.
The programmatic open marketplace is faltering, but publishers see a bright spot in private programmatic deals
Publishers are coming to terms with their open programmatic marketplace RPMs being 20-55% lower than they were this time last year, but the hope is that programmatic guaranteed deals will make up the deficit.
SponsoredWhy Best Buy Ads sees retail media as integral to its customer-centric purpose
Sponsored by Best Buy Ads Retail media networks have become critical for marketers, with retailers investing in ways that enable advertisers to engage consumers across online and offline channels. Given the wealth of retailers’ first-party customer data and measurement capabilities, retail media networks have become a natural fit for augmenting performance marketing programs. Alongside the […]
Atlas Obscura wants to be profitable before raising funds in a tricky media market
Atlas Obscura wants to turn a profit this year before it raises another funding round, at a time when publishers are facing lower valuations and pickier investors as deal activity slows.
Marketers weigh the cons of working with Google Ad Manager amid Justice Department’s new lawsuit
When is it time to back away?