The back and forth between brands extolling or deprecating the efficacy of Facebook’s ad platform is not helping. In a recent ComScore study, the company found that ads on the giant social network — in this case, Starbucks and Target — work. GM, however, believes otherwise, as it recently announced that it will not spend any money on Facebook advertising.
Add WPP’s chief, Sir Martin Sorrell, to the naysayer’s club. Sort of. Speaking with The Guardian, Sorrell says that Facebook is a great branding mechanism but not really an “advertising medium.” This is an important distinction, as WPP spends about $65 billion a year on behalf of its clients. WPP plans to spend a scant $400 million on Facebook this year, compared to the $2 billion it will spend on Google. Sorrell has previously expressed doubts about social media as an advertising medium, saying, for example, in 2010 that he has “fundamental doubts” about advertising in social media. Two years on, it appears as though little has changed for him — and Facebook has work to do swaying the ad industry’s top echelon. After all, if the head of the world’s largest marketing group is advising its clients not to play in the Facebook playground, that’s not a great sign.
“[Facebook] will be very successful no doubt, it is the third largest country on the planet [counting its 900 million users], and has a good shot at being the largest, but it does have issues to deal with,” he (Sorrell) said. “Monetisation, mobile, the IPO pressure cooker. The eyes of the world are on you. We have to look at Facebook in the long term. This is a marathon not a sprint.” According to the digital business analysts comScore, potentially more than 40% of Facebook usage comes from mobile, but the social network is so far struggling to convert this into significant revenues. “The $400 million on Facebook might look big but it is pretty small change, entry level spending for WPP,” said a senior WPP executive, commenting on the group’s strategy. “Facebook is not brilliant for response [to advertiser campaigns] so far and there is the growing issue of the amount of usage over mobile which they can’t monetise.”
Read the rest of the article at The Guardian. Follow The Guardian on Twitter @guardian.
Publishers say the competition is steeper than expected for event sponsorship dollars this year
Selling events was harder than expected for some publishers in Q2, but having a niche helped win some of the coveted sponsorship dollars.
Why some publishers are giving their AI chatbots a personality
BuzzFeed and Ingenio are hoping giving their chatbots a unique voice and tone will differentiate their AI products but others are prioritizing utility over entertainment.
Digiday+ Research: Nearly two-thirds of publishers think they will lose when the third-party cookie dies
Publishers have been busy prepping for the end of the third-party cookie, but that doesn't mean they think they'll come out on top in the post-cookie era. In fact, publishers count themselves among those who stand to lose from the end of the cookie.
SponsoredWhat the measurement and currency discussion really means to TV advertisers
Ali Mack, head of TV and agency, Experian Major streaming video providers have recently made headlines by adopting new currencies for ad measurement, threatening Nielsen’s long-standing TV ratings monopoly. NBCUniversal, for example, has certified iSpot and VideoAmp as currencies for advanced audiences and formed the Joint Industry Committee with Paramount, TelevisaUnivision and Warner Bros. Discovery. […]
Media Briefing: Publisher execs fear lack of visibility for Q3, but feel steady year over year
Publisher execs share how Q2 shook out for their businesses as they brace for an equally murky second half.
Spotify cancels six true crime podcasts amid layoffs, Gimlet-Parcast merger
Spotify is canceling six shows and laying off 200 people as it merges its Gimlet and Parcast units to push its podcast business towards profitability.