Snapchat is hoping to soothe user concerns after it updated its terms of services, leaving many wondering that the app was breaching people’s privacy.
It all started late last week when Snapchat rolled out a routine update that included broadly worded phrases, which many interpreted to mean Snapchat could save supposedly private snaps and sell them — a rumor that was perpetuated by “Harold and Kumar” actor Kal Penn in a tweet that was retweeted more than 2,000 times:
— Kal Penn (@kalpenn) October 29, 2015
From there, the problem snowballed, assisted by misreporting from various outlets. U.K.’s Independent wrote that Snapchat can now “broadcast your private snaps;” The Sydney Morning Herald warned “Snapchat now owns your photos, even after they disappear.”
Not so, according to Snapchat.
The app aimed to clear up the “confusion” surrounding the rules, saying the rules were rewritten so “they’d read the way people actually talk.”
The company also once again warned people that it doesn’t have control over whether your annoying friends screenshot a snap, reinforcing the notion that just because Snapchat deletes a snap, it doesn’t mean its completely gone. “Because we continue to delete them from our servers as soon as they’re read, we could not — and do not — share them with advertisers or business partners.”
Snapchat admitted that its Terms of Services does give the app more ownership over snaps because of its new Live Stories tool, which lets people submit snaps for its 100 million users to see. “We need that license when it comes to, for example, Snaps submitted to Live Stories, where we have to be able to show those Stories around the world—and even replay them or syndicate them.”
Basically, if Snapchat ever wanted to take a screenshot of its Live Stories to use a television ad, for example, it can. Other social networks, like Facebook and Instagram, also contain these clauses in its terms of services.
Judging by Snapchat’s always punchy Twitter presence, some users were scared off by the legalese and deleted the app likely prompting this damage control. The app was retweeting dozens of messages like this:
Just for the snapchat retweet bc it makes me feel important but really forget all y’all haters! https://t.co/DbezrZ8yXO
— Sam Pereless (@twitsbysp) November 2, 2015
Still, the rule remains: Don’t snap anything that you don’t want your mom to see because Snapchat is not quite 100 percent ephemeral, as much as it would like to be.
How agencies adapt as bots evolve
Social media bots may represent just a sliver of an app's total users, but it turns out they may be generating more content than we were previously aware. The challenge is separating the good ones from the bad.
Publishers feel the crunch of cookieless browsers like Apple’s Safari
Bid enrichment provides publishers the means of sprucing up their cookieless impressions to improve their value in advertisers’ eyes.
Why Hearst is building a commerce marketplace
Publisher commerce marketplaces aren't always successful, but Hearst's Sheel Shah hopes his company's new marketplace will capitalize on the natural evolution of its readers' online shopping habits.
Sponsored<strong>How marketers are responding to shoppers’ wants this holiday season</strong>
‘Death by a thousand paper cuts’: Publishers fret over alternative ID overload hurting site performance
Publishers lack the data to know which IDs they can afford not to support and are worried a surplus of IDs can slow page-load speeds and lower sites' search rankings.
Member ExclusiveMedia Buying Briefing: Separating agency progress from posturing around carbon reduction and sustainability
Could it be that the media world is finally taking concrete steps toward decarbonization — or will many of the efforts underway become the butt of a joke (or worse, the focus of an upcoming John Oliver segment)?