Header bidding, the industry obsession du juor, has quickly become an enticing gambit for publishers looking to squeeze more revenue out of their inventory. But that doesn’t mean they’re willing to look past the tech’s faults.
With header bidding, publishers can combine demand for the inventory from both direct and indirect buyers in a single unified auction. This lets them make more money for their space because all demand partners are bidding at the same time.
“The risk is that the very thing you’re trying to accomplish with header bidding gets negated once you implement it,” said Tribune Publishing head of programmatic Lori Tavoularis. ”You’re trying to get more scale and people to see your site, but more latency can lead to fewer impressions and less viewability. That’s a challenge balancing that.”
Such is one of the major technical challenges that face publishers looking to implement header bidding, which is far more complex than just adding a few lines of code to a site’s backend. Beyond just the basic technical aspects, publishers also have to consider how header bidding fits into their overall ad-deal flow and figure out which and how many header bidders to work with.
“You have to put a lot of tech into using a header bidder, and a lot of publishers may not have the tech resources to do it or understand it,” said Business Insider vp of programmatic and data strategy Jana Meron. “It’s a lot.”
Publishers are also concerned about how header bidding might leak data about their audience to their partner bidders, who can then use what they learn to buy access to that audience for cheaper elsewhere. It’s a data-leakage concern shared by both publishers and brands, which should give publishers pause before they rush to adopt header bidding, said Matt Prohaska, CEO of Prohaska Consulting .
“Header bidding looks great monetarily, but a lot of publishers are waking up to the fact that there’s a bit of a ‘seller beware’ element to this pitch,” he said.
Photo: Flickr/Scott Beale