There’s little doubt that much of ad buying is moving to a machine basis, which means that a lot of ads will be traded on a real-time basis and targeted to specific audiences. Agencies want this, marketers want this and publishers have little choice.
The big question for publishers is what effect, if any, this will have on their businesses. In this, they have gone through an accelerated process of the Kubler-Ross stages of grieving. There was denial (another remnant channel), anger (our data is stolen!), bargaining (private exchanges), depression (maybe I’ll just join an ad tech company) and acceptance (let’s figure this out). And there is a lot to figure out.
What’s become clear is that the shift to programmatic buying in general, and to RTB specifically, is bringing “efficiency” to the marketplace. Efficiency is a great thing unless what you do is what is being made more efficient. The drive for more efficient buys in RTB is putting pricing pressure on the entire display ad market. According to Magna Global, display advertising globally rose just 1.5 percent in 2013. That’s not very good in a market that expanded 14.4 percent overall for the year. In fact, the reason Magna identified: price drops.
That’s the situation today, when 17 percent of buying is through exchanges. In five years, Magna director of global forecasting Vincent Letang expects 43 percent of display advertising to be bought and sold via exchanges.
“We see that non-premium banner pricing is being challenged, and inventory is commoditizing due to growing supply and the impact of ‘programmatic’ trading [exchanges],” he said in an email.
Publishers have little choice but to retool on the fly. Meredith Levien, CRO of Forbes, made a great case for embracing the programmatic era. “Even the most successful premium publishers can’t go it alone when it comes to delivering individuals, because it’s not just individuals marketers want but individuals at scale,” she wrote. “So unless you are a portal (and there are only a handful of those by my count), you should be taking ad exchanges as seriously as your ad buyers are.”
It’s a sign of the times that even the most white-glove of publishers, Conde Nast, is looking for its place in the programmatic world, albeit very slowly and with great hesitation. At the end of the day, publishers are sellers, and sellers must go to where the buyers are.
More in Media
OpenAI, The New York Times debate copyright infringement of AI tech companies in first trial arguments
The copyright infringement trial between The New York Times and OpenAI kicked off in a federal court hearing on Tuesday. Here’s what both parties argued.
Financial Times, MiQ and Uber Advertising are 2024 Digiday Awards Europe finalists
This year, the companies driving innovation in Europe focused on omnichannel strategies, including leaning on first-party data and AI-driven insights to improve targeting and audience engagement. The Digiday Awards Europe finalists also share a common theme of elevating user experiences to deliver more impactful technology and campaigns. For instance, the Financial Times is a nominee […]
Digiday+ Research: More than half of publishers reported revenue increases in 2024
Publishers said revenues were up last year and media companies had a successful 2024 — but that success didn’t extend to the media industry as a whole.