Skip Brand is CEO of Martini Media, a digital media and content platform for engaging audiences with the most money and influence online. Follow him @skipperbrand.
Brian Morrissey’s “The Native Ad Fallacy” attempts to debunk the native advertising trend. While he raises some excellent points in his article, the view from out here in Silicon Valley looks a whole lot different.
For starters, let’s agree on the definition of the term “native ad.” I’ll refer to the definition I’ve used previously in this publication: A native ad is so well-integrated that it feels like it’s part of the page. Native ads must be user-controlled; they shouldn’t do anything unless a user takes a deliberate action to manually expand them. Native ads should also have custom content. A perfect example of this is work being done by The Atlantic, Funny or Die and Forbes. These are native to their particular publications, but Forbes is moving forward with custom content framed within a standard IAB unit, one of the Rising Stars.
It’s important to note that despite the pundits’ dismissal of it as the latest shiny object, native is actually catching on. Top publishers are quickly climbing on board. Why? Because it’s good for the goose and good for the gander. Often when we see a trend without merit, it’s either the publisher or the advertiser attempting to drive it along. That’s not the case with native; both sides are passionately on board. Advertisers, particularly brand advertisers, love it because it delivers high engagement rates while allowing them to showcase their own high-quality content. Publishers are pleased because native respects the design of their site. There’s no banner pulling focus from the masthead, no animated SUV driving across the page. The ads are literally part of the page design. Furthermore, a publisher can demand a premium for this oversized, high-end ad unit, and advertisers will benefit from a higher-quality environment — and less competition due to fewer ads on the page.
Market acceptance alone proves we’re onto something here. I don’t see native being any more a fad than social media is, based on the reception it’s received to date.
While the native trend may have oozed out of Silicon Valley, the fact is, Silicon Valley doesn’t like the term “custom content.” It implies a lack of scalability. Native ads, by definition, are supposed to feature custom content. The native ad must have custom content and — particularly if it’s going outlive its label as a trend — must be scalable.
Fortunately, scalable and custom are not mutually exclusive. New standard ad units, like the IAB portrait, function as native advertising and support scalability. These multi-module units feature an area that can be leveraged to showcase publisher content, and two other units that can be used pretty much any way the advertiser chooses — with HD video, a store locator, social media feeds, whatever the advertiser likes. The module leveraged to promote publisher content houses what we refer to as “scalable custom” content; it’s original, publisher-created content that can be syndicated via the ad unit and updated in real time.
It’s critical to note that when native advertising leverages standard IAB Rising Stars ad unit, “native” and “programmatic” are also no longer mutually exclusive. A standardized IAB Rising Star native unit can actually be part of a programmatic ad buy.
I’ll grant that native advertising may not be new, but the timing of its rise to popularity is perfect. With the decline of traditional display and the rise of programmatic, the industry
needed a fresh option that would respond to all the wish lists, particularly with respect to scalability and better engagement. Even if this is a new label on an old bottle, it’s still a pretty nice wine. Now, I may just be another Silicon Valley wannabe millionaire, but I’ll shell out a little extra for a good vintage.
Member ExclusiveMedia Briefing: The pros, cons of three pricing models for publisher, sportbook content deals
Publishers and sportsbooks are looking for new payout models beyond the standard cost-per-acquisition structure, which is priced on average between $200-500 per new customer.
The New York Times looks to gaming product to grow subscriptions
The Times' use of games as a subscriber funnel is part of a renewed focus on gaming sparked by the company's acquisition of Wordle in January.
Inside the NFL’s youth-focused social strategy
As part of the NFL Content Creator Network, the league is engaging with fans in new, innovative ways via gaming or just through creative social media activations.
SponsoredHow FAST channels are redefining primetime opportunities for advertisers
Sponsored by Vevo With the competition from content providers continuing to build, the traditional primetime TV slots are no longer guaranteeing the mass audiences they once did. Television viewership is evolving, and the primetime window of 8–11 p.m. is less broadly reflective of younger audiences’ content consumption habits. In 2022, attracting TV viewers is a […]
Publishers test personalizing newsletters with varying degrees of success
Publishers are testing personalizing newsletter content based on readers’ interests - but it doesn't always work.
Indie agency Known beats out incumbents to land AMC Networks’ media business
In essence, Known is helping AMC Networks become more of a direct-to-consumer client as the programmer expands into more streaming options on top of its linear foothold.