Why media companies make for skittish investors
It’s been a busy few months for strategic investing. In August, NBCUniversal invested $200 million in BuzzFeed, just a week after a similar deal its parent company Comcast made with Vox Media. Fox News and The Daily Mail have also recently opened up their wallets for investments in DraftKings and TigerBeat, respectively.
With these deals, the startups get more money to grow, but strategic investments also give them the kind of resources that would be harder or more expensive to get on their own. Vox, for example, also plans to work with Comcast on video advertising and programming, likely on television and on Comcast’s upcoming video service, Watchable.
Their investors, on the other hand, get small but key stakes in ascendant media companies, giving them what is essentially additional research and development arms. That’s vital for a company like NBCUniversal, which, unlike BuzzFeed and Vox Media, hasn’t cracked the formula for reaching young readers, who get most of their news online.
“I think big media companies that are looking for paths forward are wise to participate, even if modestly, in the startup world,” said Marcus Brauchli, managing partner or North Base Media, a media investment firm. “The visibility and signals the market sends can be immensely valuable in thinking through approaches that might benefit a larger group.”
Plenty of media companies agree. Legacy media companies such as The New York Times, Hearst and The Tribune company have all launched their own investment arms, with the hopes of getting early looks at emerging companies.
But while strategic investing makes sense on paper, making them work is difficult, according to Roy Bahat, head of Bloomberg Beta, Bloomberg’s investment fund. “These types of investments are like a ballerina trying to dance with an aircraft carrier; the two just don’t go together,” he said.
Blame DNA. Startups, which are used to moving fast, often struggle to work with larger, more entrenched companies, which move more slowly. At the same time, the businesses of the younger companies take years to unfold, while the typical legacy media company operates quarter by quarter. This is a different model from traditional venture capital investing, which operates on a much longer timeline.
There’s also the risk that as time goes on, the companies’ shared interests could diverge. This could also happen if the original media executive in charge of the deal moves on.“These companies aren’t making these investments out of the kindness of their hearts,” said Ava Seave, principal at media consulting firm Quantum Media. “There’s always that question of how long the incentives will be the same for all sides.”
These challenges haven’t stopped many media companies from launching their own strategic investment arms. Hearst, ABC and The New York Times have all started their own investment funds in recent years in the hopes of getting an early look at young companies.
Media companies don’t always pick winners. Time Warner, for example, was one of the six companies that invested $56.5 million in video streaming service OnLive, which dissolved after its assets were acquired by Sony. The New York Times was an early investor in the now-defunct ad tech company appssavvy, which raised $13.3 million before quietly closing its door.
Of course, venture capital investing also comes with some hangups. VCs focus on companies with high growth expectations that media enterprises — with their high costs and time required to achieve scale — aren’t always able to deliver. Recode and Gigaom, to name two recent examples, attracted venture funding but found that they couldn’t match the demands attached to the cash. Gigaom folded, and Recode sold to Vox Media.
But while neither strategic nor venture investment is foolproof, investors say startups are better off with the latter.
“Commercial relationships are temporary, but investments are forever,” Bloomberg Beta’s Bahat said.
‘We’re netting out with higher revenue’: Publishers reaping the benefits of Snapchat’s strong second half
With CPMs up as much as 20% year over year in the fourth quarter, many Discover publishers are bullish on the upstart platform for next year.
How Cosmo is building brand affinity with younger audiences through its focus on commerce
Cosmopolitan's focus on e-commerce through a line of branded wines and its own shopping holiday has led to a 254% increase in product sales.
‘Go to market faster’: The Washington Post’s Arc goes outside the tent for payment and data integrations
Subscriber revenue has become more of a priority to the Washington Post's Arc clients since it launched its subscription tools last year.
SponsoredPublishers will lead the charge as cookie-less advertising becomes the norm
Steve Wing, managing director, EMEA, Magnite As the advertising industry moves closer to a cookieless world — one in which browserless environments including connected TV (CTV) and mobile in-app are an increasingly large part of ad budgets — publishers will have an increasingly important role in developing the future of identity. Segment creation and identity […]
‘Profitability in the back half of next year’: BuzzFeed CEO Jonah Peretti (and Verizon Media CEO Guru Gowrappan) on their big merger
A special Digiday podcast episode features Interviews with BuzzFeed CEO Jonah Peretti and Verizon Media CEO Guru Gowrappan.
‘People have had permission to experiment’: Pandemic expedites rethink on 9-to-5 work structures
Starting out as a short-term fix to weather the coronavirus storm, employers are seeing work hours outside the traditional 9-to-5 week as a new normal.