If you can’t build it, buy it, right? That seems to be the M.O for Conde Nast these days. Fresh off the heels of its investment in Trigger Media, the NYT reported that Conde is now an 11 percent owner of Flite, an ad-customization tool for gussying up banner ads.
It’s a small stake, to be sure. It comes on the heels of Gannett, already the owner of rich media ad vendor Point Roll, buying all of Blinq Media, a Facebook management platform. Is this a sign that publishers are getting serious about owning technology? Yes and no.
Both companies clearly see the need to diversify their businesses in a tech direction. That’s not very surprising. And these marketing services are complementary to what they already do for advertisers. Neither of these deals are monster acquisitions. The fact is Conde Nast and Gannett can’t compete with the firepower of Silicon Valley tech giants when it comes to the choicest (and priciest) acquisitions. It’s no mistake that Gannett got Blinq while Salesforce picked up the far larger Buddy Media.
It begs the question why Conde and Gannet aren’t looking to build this stuff first. That’s a tempting proposition, but history shows that innovation tends to happen from the fringes, not within the giant incumbents.
Image via Shutterstock
More in Media
Publishers are still feeling the effects of a change Facebook made in May that caused a steep decline in referral traffic. Nearly four months later, publishers aren’t sure when — or if — that traffic will come back.
A new definition for MFAs is available but the vague nature of the guidelines is leading to a lack of standards that might prevent adoption.
The publishers who attended DPS were focused on the potential upsides of applying the technology to their operations while guarding against the downsides.