In the last few weeks, visitors to BBC iPlayer, the public service broadcaster’s video and audio on-demand platform, have been met with notices that mandatory registration including home address is coming soon. A number of publishers and broadcasters have employed required registration to offer more relevant content to audiences.
According to the company, 10 million people have registered, up from 7 million last September when registration was still optional and the BBC announced plans to enforce registration. Those who haven’t yet signed up are infrequent users of the platform, the company said, but it was unwilling to put a number on these users.
“Our objectives are not to create filter bubbles or, in the case of news, draw people into echo chambers, but to help fulfill a public service remit in the digital space when audience behavior is shifting,” said Andrew Scott, the launch director of myBBC, the BBC’s personalization initiative.
Treading that balance of offering a personalized service without the negatives of filter bubbles means BBC iPlayer, home of “Doctor Who” and “Strictly Come Dancing,” has tested a range of ways it recommends the next show for someone to watch once the credits roll.
“The way to provide the audience with the next-best actions depends on the specific situation,” said Scott. “Purely algorithmically provides you with scale, but there are a variety of mechanisms.”
Algorithms could serve up what to watch next by recommending the next episode in the series, or they can recommend shows that fall into the same genre. Using registration data, the BBC can use audience browsing history from the platform to recommend the next show or base recommendations on location. For instance, someone living in Scotland may be more interested in current affairs shows based there. Editorial intervention can occur, too: Recently, editors have grouped a number of episodes of “Tomorrow’s World,” a science and tech program, that tell a story in that specific order.
Getting people to engage with recommendations means they will consume twice as much content as those that don’t, said Scott. People who have signed in to iPlayer spend 20 percent more time with the BBC, he said, although he wouldn’t share specific numbers.
To encourage people to view more recommended content, one hypothesis tested recommending shows that aired within the last seven days, rather than within the last 30 days (the duration content lasts on the platform). After three weeks of testing, Scott said the more recent content was “significantly” more appealing, but he couldn’t share exact numbers.
Amid data-privacy concerns and the looming General Data Protection Regulation that will require companies to gain consent if they plan on storing or using personal data, the BBC — following the advice of the Information Commissioner’s Office — has layered the way it communicates to its audience about why it needs audience data, pointing to snippets of information during the sign-up process that explain the BBC uses the data to tailor more relevant content to audiences. The BBC also links to a more comprehensive site with its policies on what data it collects, how it uses the data inside and outside of the organization and how to opt out of personalization, although Scott said that few people have opted to do so. The policy is targeted to the reading level of a 13-year-old. (The ICO believes people 13 and older can legally consent to sharing their data.)
BBC iPlayer’s drive for mandatory registration has not been without its opponents: Audience members that already pay an annual license fee of £147 ($192) aren’t necessarily keen on handing over their data, too. The BBC has tried to publicly address these concerns on the BBC Radio 4 show “Feedback.”
The BBC also expected that mandatory registrations would lead to a 10 percent drop in views on iPlayer before view numbers returned to normal, based on how other broadcasters have managed the process, but that decline hasn’t happened. “We’ve definitely had some pushback,” said Scott, “but because we have rolled this out gradually and tried to be so clear in what we are doing, that response has been pretty well contained.”
Image courtesy of BBC iPlayer via Facebook.
Publishers say the competition is steeper than expected for event sponsorship dollars this year
Selling events was harder than expected for some publishers in Q2, but having a niche helped win some of the coveted sponsorship dollars.
Why some publishers are giving their AI chatbots a personality
BuzzFeed and Ingenio are hoping giving their chatbots a unique voice and tone will differentiate their AI products but others are prioritizing utility over entertainment.
Media Briefing: Publisher execs fear lack of visibility for Q3, but feel steady year over year
Publisher execs share how Q2 shook out for their businesses as they brace for an equally murky second half.
SponsoredWhat the measurement and currency discussion really means to TV advertisers
Ali Mack, head of TV and agency, Experian Major streaming video providers have recently made headlines by adopting new currencies for ad measurement, threatening Nielsen’s long-standing TV ratings monopoly. NBCUniversal, for example, has certified iSpot and VideoAmp as currencies for advanced audiences and formed the Joint Industry Committee with Paramount, TelevisaUnivision and Warner Bros. Discovery. […]
Digiday+ Research: Nearly two-thirds of publishers think they will lose when the third-party cookie dies
Publishers have been busy prepping for the end of the third-party cookie, but that doesn't mean they think they'll come out on top in the post-cookie era. In fact, publishers count themselves among those who stand to lose from the end of the cookie.
As AI spreads across the marketing landscape, data’s role will be key to success or danger
There’s a growing awareness of the risks inherent in AI's ultra-powerful potential, but whether enough steps are being taken to mitigate them remains a huge question mark.