Top publishers are wary of programmatic ad buying. They know a few things. One is that many advertisers are enthusiastic about buying this way, particularly when they can target specific audiences and leave the rest. The other is that this often leads to lower overall CPMs as the wheat is separated from the chaff.
For most, that’s meant a grudging acceptance of data-fueled ad buying, machine to machine. The middle ground has mostly been through private exchanges and direct pipes to agency trading desks, complete with safeguards to protect the publisher from getting taken to the cleaners. But is this possible?
Walker Jacobs, evp of digital ad sales at Turner and a regular scourge of programmatic buying evangelists, thinks this is a fool’s errand. He makes a persuasive case in Adexchanger that “no media company … is exceptional at selling both context and brands and selling audience … because those two strategies are at odds with each other. “
That comes back to the identity crisis Internet advertising has long faced. It talks the game of brand advertising, which is premised on high-quality content and spotless environments, but it has set up a system of cherry-picked impressions and click counting ready-made for direct marketing. Premium publishers regularly lament the commoditization of their advertising placements. And yet, at the same time, the No. 1 desire for RTB buyers is for more quality inventory. Turner has made the decision to just say no:
It’s a very funny thing, because to the untrained eye, we might seem like an unsophisticated old media company that is scared to embrace technology. The opposite couldn’t be much closer to the truth. We’ve invested a tremendous amount in technology and understanding our audiences, and being able to develop analytics and insights to marketing partners, leveraging the same and similar technologies that audience-based targeting harnesses. We believe the downside of RTB and private exchanges is that it fragments audiences.
Turner, with high-end content like the NCAA basketball championships and, now, Funny or Die, can get away with this absolutist approach. The question is whether other premium content publishers could — and should — follow suit.
-
Marketers weigh the cons of working with Google Ad Manager amid Justice Department’s new lawsuit
When is it time to back away?
-
Atlas Obscura wants to be profitable before raising funds in a tricky media market
Atlas Obscura wants to turn a profit this year before it raises another funding round, at a time when publishers are facing lower valuations and pickier investors as deal activity slows.
-
Publishers report Q1 ad revenue is pacing 10-25% behind forecasts
Publishers are facing a slow start to Q1 and sales teams have a lot of work to do to regain lost time.
-
SponsoredQ&A: How Jounce Media and Teads are framing SPO’s role in driving sustainability
As supply chain concerns abound, marketers are increasingly focusing on the main motivators that drive efficiency in their operations, including financial considerations, supply chain transparency and, most recently, environmental concerns. Sustainability has not always been at the forefront of the digital video buying process for the ad industry, but brands like Teads are taking steps […]
-
WTF is cookie stuffing?
Fraud is a well-documented pox on digital advertising, but it’s also an issue for publishers and marketers working together on affiliate marketing deals, too. One of the more tried-and-true techniques is cookie stuffing.
-
Why Vice, BBC, WaPo, others see new TikTok teams as the next wave of specialist publishing talent
As news publishers craft their TikTok strategies, Digiday spoke with the BBC, Vice, The Washington Post and LADbible to see who’s really behind the posts.
