Apple may be getting into the streaming business, according to a Wall Street Journal report. Many understandably focus on this as a move to clone Pandora, but it’s more important effect is it would confirm Apple’s commitment to advertising.
Apple bought mobile ad network Quattro back in 2010, giving birth to the iAd platform just months later. At the time, Steve Jobs promised iAds would make mobile ads suck less. That’s not really happened, for a variety of reasons. Apple’s mobile ads are still a rounding error to its business. In fact, it didn’t even crack the list of top mobile ad providers released this week.
But Apple cannot throw in the towel on advertising. The network game is a rough one. In the end, it’s better to have owned inventory as an anchor to be complemented with a network. After all Google owns plenty of mobile inventory with its search, maps and YouTube. With a Pandora-like service, Apple would also have a big chunk of premium inventory.
Ads on the streaming radio service (which may be attached to iTunes to determine musical tastes) will have ads and what better way to get more inventory than by opening up a platform that could hit the 400 million people who use iTunes.
This could be a boon for developers. Apple clearly understands that its huge competitive advantage is in the thousands of developers devoted to making its platform addictive to consumers. That means providing these developers with a path to making money. Control-freak Apple can’t rely on others, especially Google, to blaze this path alone.
And there’s clearly work to be done. Streaming music has never been a particularly great ad business. The WSJ reports that Spotify took in less than 15 percent of its revenue from ad sales — the other 85 percent came from subscriptions
Mobile is still an immature industry. The formats available are uninspiring, the analytics are questionable and the backend is far from perfect. Apple getting deeper in the business is likely a positive force for the industry figuring out these issues to finally close the monetization gap between desktop and mobile.
-
How agencies adapt as bots evolve
Social media bots may represent just a sliver of an app's total users, but it turns out they may be generating more content than we were previously aware. The challenge is separating the good ones from the bad.
-
Publishers feel the crunch of cookieless browsers like Apple’s Safari
Bid enrichment provides publishers the means of sprucing up their cookieless impressions to improve their value in advertisers’ eyes.
-
Why Hearst is building a commerce marketplace
Publisher commerce marketplaces aren't always successful, but Hearst's Sheel Shah hopes his company's new marketplace will capitalize on the natural evolution of its readers' online shopping habits.
-
Sponsored<strong>How marketers are responding to shoppers’ wants this holiday season</strong>
Matthew Tilley, executive director, marketing, Vericast With the holidays right around the corner, the economy may force some consumers to adjust their plans and stretch their dollars even further. While some shoppers may rein in their spending, others will still go all out despite a cloudy economic outlook. Given the current economic climate, consumers are […]
-
‘Death by a thousand paper cuts’: Publishers fret over alternative ID overload hurting site performance
Publishers lack the data to know which IDs they can afford not to support and are worried a surplus of IDs can slow page-load speeds and lower sites' search rankings.
-
Member ExclusiveMedia Buying Briefing: Separating agency progress from posturing around carbon reduction and sustainability
Could it be that the media world is finally taking concrete steps toward decarbonization — or will many of the efforts underway become the butt of a joke (or worse, the focus of an upcoming John Oliver segment)?
