Ad tech profits from ads on fake news — and preventing ads on fake news
For many vendors, blacklists are all they have in the arsenal to block ads from appearing on undesirable websites. But blacklists often fail in programmatic buying, and with brand anxiety high post election, some vendors are capitalizing on the zeitgeist by developing products that block ads from reaching fake news websites. Sources were split on whether these products will provide real value or are just another PR stunt.
“Kudos to them, but it just looks like a news-jacking play,” said one ad tech exec. Another added, “This is an easy marketing gimmick for people to hop onto.”
Last week, DoubleVerify announced a new product for weeding out websites associated with false politically-charged articles. Essentially, DoubleVerify groups these inflammatory sites together as a new brand-unsafe category, which allows advertisers to more easily exclude them. The list already includes hundreds of sites and will be continuously updated, said DoubleVerify CEO Wayne Gattinella.
“Yes, we did put it out quickly to address a topic that’s hot right now,” said Gattinella when asked if his company was merely making a PR push. “But the need came from advertisers who came to us over the last six weeks who are feeling pressure [from the brands they represent] to prevent ads from showing up on questionable sites.”
Gattinella insisted that DoubleVerify’s fake news product is much more than a gimmick. Within two days of its announcement, more than 100 national brands signed on to use it, as have a handful of programmatic companies, he said, though he declined to name any of them.
Fake news sites typically share similar characteristics, which often allows them to be algorithmically identifiable, Gattienalla said. Using machine learning, DoubleVerify looks for indicators across page design, headline structure, sentence structure, how much traffic comes from a single section on the website and how many total authors a website has. Then after the machines are finished, each site goes through a human audit before it’s dumped into the fake news category.
DoubleVerify’s product blocks entire domains, but some sources said that excluding at the page level would be more effective for advertisers. Although brands want to avoid the most heinous content on these websites, they still may want the cheap reach found on less-offensive articles on these websites, said Gina Kim, vp of business development at programmatic platform Adelphic.
Sizmek is working on a product that targets fake news at the page level. But the product won’t come out until 2017, said Mike Caprio, Sizmek general manager of programmatic.
“It’s easy to slap a new name on this,” Caprio said. “But I want to make sure that when we do it, we do it thoughtfully, as opposed to doing it for quick attention.”
Although the product is far from finalized, Sizmek is looking at flagging particular articles as “unconfirmed trends,” Caprio said. Using machine learning, Sizmek would scan articles for their sentiment and tone. Suspicious articles would get compared against dozens of reputable news sources such as The Wall Street Journal and CNN, and if the premise in the suspicious article (e.g. Hillary Clinton will be indicted by the FBI) isn’t verified by reliable news sources, then the article gets flagged.
Several brand safety companies told Digiday that since the election, they’ve received calls from dozens of brands who are interested in blocking their ads form fake news sites. “It [fake news] may be terrible for America, but it’s good for business,” one brand safety rep remarked.
Michael Tiffany, CEO of WhiteOps, said that what gets overlooked in the fake news discussion is that politics is just one slice of it. Sports, entertainment and medical news are suffering from a similar problem, which he believes has contributed to climate change and vaccination trutherism.
“This problem is not going away,” said Trust Metrics CEO Marc Goldberg. “But there are some solutions that can help it from getting so big. But we need help on the supply side to not let these guys [fake news] in, in the first.”
Image courtesy of Creative Commons
How publishers are handling the Juneteenth holiday this year
A number of publishers are observing Juneteenth this year, but not in the same way, with some making it an official holiday and others encouraging employees to use their PTO to take the day off.
Single-source panel measurement is key to optimizing social media planning, says DISQO report
New study is based on responses from 166,000 U.S. consumers in February and March, each of whom voluntarily allowed to have their digital behaviors observed.
Member ExclusiveMedia Briefing: How media companies’ DE&I efforts, office return statuses are affecting hiring
This week's Media Briefing looks at how issues like diversity, equity and inclusion and office return statuses are factoring into media companies' ability to hire people.
SponsoredIdentity solution fatigue is setting in: How to keep moving
By Kristina Prokop, CEO and co-founder, Eyeota As we move deeper into 2021, the desperate search for identity solutions that can smooth marketing organizations’ transitions to a cookieless world is reaching a fever pitch. There’s no shortage of new identifiers and identity technologies vying for attention — and that’s a big part of the problem. […]
Cheat Sheet: How new antitrust bills could force more data access from Facebook and Google (and stop them from favoring their own services)
A set of bills proposed recently could force platforms to stop favoring their own services and give more data access and tech connectivity to others.
BuzzFeed will finally monetarily reward its Community users for their viral quizzes, lists
BuzzFeed is testing to see if user-generated content could identify new areas of coverage for its staff, and bring in niche audiences, with a new summer program that could pay a contributor up to $10,000 for a viral post.