The Rundown: Accenture’s deal for Droga5 marks a turning point for creative agencies
The era of creative agencies is well and truly over with the sale of Droga5 to a consultancy. Accenture Interactive will now own what has been arguably one of the last “great” creative agencies, with founder David Droga remaining in his role as creative chairman.
Droga5 will retain its brand and remain its own entity. But for Accenture Interactive the acquisition sends a few messages. One is an answer to those who say consultancies lack the creative je ne sais quoi to actually make a mark in this industry. The second is that scale matters, and money talks. Even Droga, who famously said he’d never sell and wanted to stay independent, got a price and a deal he couldn’t say no to.
Creative purists, of course, are looking at the deal hoping it’ll fail: I had at least three or four people text me Wednesday to tell me how working inside consultancies is very different from being inside a “truly creative” place, and that talent would flee in favor of indie agencies or even, gasp, holding companies.
But more interestingly, this strikes what to me is a final death knell in the heart of creative agencies. In an era of measurement and metrics, creativity isn’t particularly important any more. Brands still need creative talent, but the days of needing a specialized, award-winning agency that didn’t do anything else but “creative” are gone. Brands are doing more executional work themselves, since it’s easier to in-house capabilities like production and creative ideation. Creative, especially digital creative, commands lower margins, and it’s harder to charge a premium for tactical work. Where they find ground is in strategy, but brands find it hard to pay for “strategy” when they can simply do it themselves, or go to a bigger management consultancy or media agency that proves it as well — and brings them discounts or better rates on other services to boot.
Simply put, this isn’t about consultancies wanting to be in the creative agency game, or agencies trying to be in the consultancy game. This is just proof that when it comes to succeeding in the agency game, “creative” by itself just isn’t enough. — Shareen Pathak
Price monitoring Amazon
Amazon dominated the retail industry by competing heavily on price, but recent changes to its seller policies indicate that offering the cheapest products will no longer be Amazon’s number one value proposition. Instead, it will compete on inventory, convenience and fast delivery.
“We have yet to see this happen, but I would bet money that over the next two years, you will see Amazon prices across the board start to inch up,” Joe Scartz, the chief digital commerce officer at Velocity Commerce Group, told me over coffee recently. Velocity works with clients like Clorox to help them sell on Amazon, perfecting SEO and content strategies and working with Amazon vendor managers on the brands’ behalf. He’s not the only one who’s on Amazon price watch. When Amazon rolled back its policy that required third-party sellers to offer an equal or lower price on Amazon compared to prices on competing retailers and their own sites, it sent a shockwave through the industry.
“This is like Amazon removing one of its 10 Commandments,” said Eric Heller, the founder of Marketplace Ignition.
Amazon is associated with offering the best prices, and it could be hoping that the reputation sticks even if prices go up, or that Prime Members are Amazon-addicted enough to not notice or care that a product may be available for slightly cheaper elsewhere.
For now, Amazon is still exerting control over its vendors. Brands that have worked with Amazon to launch exclusive products said that Amazon gets the final say on pricing, and the roll back of pricing requirements doesn’t apply to vendors. Amazon is still setting pricing for vendors below competitive retailers’, and dropping prices if sales take place, according to the CEO of one vendor selling on Amazon.
“Anyone have any thoughts as to why it is reasonable or fair for [Amazon] to drop its anti-competitive price matching for Sellers but not for brands in Vendor?” he asked on LinkedIn recently in a group for Amazon vendors. Responses were mixed, but it was clear: Vendors aren’t happy about the incongruences in pricing regulations. As Amazon rethinks its relationship with vendors to focus on higher-volume businesses, it could bend to brands’ demands. — Hilary Milnes
‘The biggest theme is uncertainty’: How coronavirus has changed the wedding industry
Over the last five months, couples and wedding vendors alike have set up new ways of working together.
The end of schmooze: How coronavirus has upended the time-honored practice of industry networking
Schmooze, integral to tentpole industry events, is largely on hold this year. Was it really necessary to do business after all?
‘The most influential people aren’t on social’: Why amplification is not key to Team Epiphany’s influencer strategy
In the latest episode of Digiday's weekly show The New Normal, Coltrane Curtis talks about his company's unique influencer marketing strategy.
SponsoredFrom pop-up to permanent: Three trends driving digital transformation in 2020
By Dries Buytaert Brands have displayed rapid innovation over the past few years, building pop-up stores seemingly overnight to test new retail, product and marketing concepts. Now, as a result of COVID-19, something similar is happening digitally, with brands operating on compressed timelines to launch digital-first “pop-up” businesses — except unlike typical pop-ups these are […]
‘We’re letting Facebook grade their own homework’: Here’s how advertisers’ desired changes differ from overall boycott
The overall goals of civil rights advocates organizing the boycott differ slightly from those of advertisers.
How Facebook’s brand safety audit with the Media Rating Council will work
The MRC audit will determine whether Facebook has applied an advertising adjacency standard into its brand safety protections.