Digiday Research: Talent is primary hurdle for bringing media buying in-house
This research is based on unique data collected from our proprietary audience of publisher, agency, brand and tech insiders. It’s available to Digiday+ members. More from the series →
Nearly one-in-four companies are bringing some media-buying functions in-house, believing that it will lead to improved transparency and greater cost efficiencies. But those companies face one major challenge: hiring the right people to actually do it.
Seventy-three percent of client-side marketers said hiring the necessary talent was a significant obstacle to taking media buying in-house, according to a survey of 45 programmatic marketers at the May 2018 Digiday Programmatic Marketing Summit held in New Orleans.
There are several reasons why companies are struggle to attract talent from agencies. One is why media buyers would willingly restrict themselves to only working on one company “in a corporate and boring environment”, according to a report by ID Comms. Travel-booking site Kayak said it took them over a year to hire the right people for their internal media team.
Media buyers have other incentives to stay at agencies, too, including access to greater resources and a larger array of projects and campaigns to contribute to and learn from. Additionally, mid-size companies that lack the appeal of startups or the scale of major corporate brands could struggle to interest would-be employees.
In the Digiday survey, few marketers worried about obtaining buy-in from senior leadership. Just 15 percent of marketers said getting senior leaders was a challenge. That’s because developing internal media-buying often leads to cost-savings which bodes well with executives focused on P&L.
However, arguments over cost saving can be used against in-house media teams and stress the importance of leadership buy-in. One in-house media buyer at a CPG company told Digiday an agency won over its executives by claiming it could get lower rates for ad placements than its internal team could. According the the media buyer who spoke with Digiday, the agency claiming to save money would have had to reduce rates by 25 percent on the last 30 percent of the uncommitted ad spend to meet their projection. Ultimately the executives sided with the agency and shut down its internal team.
More in Marketing
Why angel investor Matthew Ball still believes in the metaverse
Matthew Ball’s 2022 book “The Metaverse: And How It Will Revolutionize Everything” was a national bestseller in the U.S. and U.K. On July 23, he plans to publish the second edition of the book.
Marketing Briefing: Why sustainability is ‘not a priority’ for marketers right now
Anecdotally, there have been noticeably fewer requests from marketers on ways to market sustainability efforts in recent months, according to agency execs, who say that requests had been commonplace in the late 2010s and early 2020s.
‘We’re watching the war’: Tubi hits growth spurt, but isn’t part of the streaming wars, CMO Nicole Parlapiano says
On the latest episode of the Digiday Podcast, Tubi CMO Nicole Parlapiano shares her perspective on the so-called streaming wars, pitching Tubi’s multicultural viewers and the streaming platform’s growth track.