Influencer marketing fraud is a growing problem in an industry valued at over $1 billion. Influencers — essentially social media stars with large followings — are attractive to marketers for the notion they’re more “authentic” than regular ad buys. But some of that authenticity is fake, whether it’s using so-called Instagram pods, bots or buying followers, and many marketers are starting to question just what they’re really getting for their money. We break it down.
- A single day’s worth of posts tagged #sponsored or #ad on Instagram contained over 50 percent fake engagements, according to data from anti-fraud company Sway Ops. Out of 118,007 comments, only 20,942 were not made by bot followers.
- Sway found that more than 15 percent of influencers who sign on to do sponsored posts (and take the product associated with it) never create a post.
- Bot comments are responsible for over 40 percent of total comments for over 500 of 2,000 sponsored posts made each day, per Sway.
- Pods remain a problem as well: Sway’s recent research found that out of 2,000 posts, an average of only 36 sponsored posts made per day contained no Instagram pod activity, fake comments, fake likes or uneven ratios of bot followers to engagements.
On Instagram pods
What remains up for debate is what constitutes fraud. While most agree that “bot” comments and buying followers are fraud, influencers themselves disagree about whether pods are considered fraud. Instagram pods are groups of up to 30 Instagrammers that work with each other to comment and like each other’s posts — hacking Instagram by “increasing” engagement, albeit artificially. Many influencers use pods and say it’s totally legit. “I don’t see pods as a problem because bloggers in a similar set of interest groups are supportive of each other,” said one influencer who preferred not to be named.
Others say it’s shady: “For Instagrammers or influencers, they are artificially building themselves,” said YouTuber Zach Bussey. “It’s a dangerous precedent to set for themselves because it means they can never quit doing it. It’s not like they will get to a certain number and then say, ‘I can quit that,’ and see their numbers plummet. Instead, they have to keep doing it — over and over and over to keep any semblance of growth.”
How to spot fraud
Most people agree it can be tough to spot fraud, but there are a few methods:
- An overnight spike in followers that cannot be explained by outside factors usually means the influencer has purchased followers.
- A skewed ratio of engagement (likes and comments) to followers. Comments should represent about 2 percent of total engagement on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.
- Comments that are unrelated to the actual content posted usually indicate bought audiences.
- About 15 percent of comments should correspond with the purchase funnel.
How brands respond
“Some brands are frankly oblivious to the real-versus-fake-audience issue. They want audience size at any cost, and they’ve become desensitized to “paid followers/engagement” thanks to the platforms’ own ad products,” said Collectively CEO Alexa Tonner.
The FTC view
Fraud is so much in the limelight that the Federal Trade Commission recently issued 100 letters to influencers and brands about how they were disclosing endorsements or paid advertising. Less has been said about bots or buying fake followers — the FTC doesn’t necessarily care about or control that, since it’s focused on the customers — but much of fraud is also about shady practices that include mislabeling sponsored content.
The influencer agency view
“It’s a pretty poorly kept secret that some influencers buy fans, but I’d say it’s probably a pretty small percentage. There’s no way to tell by just looking at an account, but we keep a close look at growth rate of influencers and the ratio of engagement to followers,” said Tonner.
“I don’t think brands even know how large this problem actually is, and the business risk for influencer platforms seems to cause them to ignore talking about it,” said Nick Waken, founder of Sway. “This reminds me of banner ads in 2012 before people figured out that bots were responsible for all of their impressions.”
‘If we can pave the way’: How OKCupid is using its app and its ads to fight for abortion rights
The online dating platform yesterday sent in-app notifications to all U.S. users encouraging them to donate to Planned Parenthood.
‘My title was non-negotiable’: A Q&A with Cathy Hackl, chief metaverse officer at Journey
Hackl's most convincing qualification for the role might be her bona fide connection to metaverse users: she’s the mother of three metaverse-native kids, including a 10-year-old who runs his own Roblox business.
Retail brands rush to cover abortion care, but not all of their workers may be covered
What’s not immediately clear from some of these post Roe announcements is how many employees will be covered by these new policies.
SponsoredWhy the caliber of content is paramount for advertisers
Agata Brodniewska, brand safety manager, Dailymotion Content is king when attracting consumers but is equally essential when courting advertisers. While both stakeholders want many of the same things, they most notably want relevant content they can count on to deliver an accurate and honest message without confusion or misinformation. This is especially important for advertisers […]
Days Inn seeks unique ways to stand out as people return to traveling
Days Inn is introducing a new, limited-edition amenity: a pillow that compliments guests. It's part of a strategy to find unique ways to stand out and help drive brand awareness.
‘Clients are being cautious’: Roe vs. Wade overturn has advertisers evaluating ads, pausing spending
Some marketers, agency execs are also reconsidering their blocklists, adding phrases related to the Supreme Court to their lists to stem potential brand safety issues.