Beyoncé profits over social media controversy with ‘Boycott Beyoncé’ T-shirt

Taking a cue from her own song “Sorry,” Beyoncé is taking the lyric “middle fingers up” on the road.

She kicked off the Formation World Tour in Miami last night, which expectedly comes with a pricey merchandise table. Placed besides the usual array of keychains, jackets and hats, there’s a T-shirt that’s attracting a lot attention not only for what it says, but for her shrewd business sense.

For $45, the T-shirt reads “Boycott Beyoncé,” a clever nod to a campaign started by the Miami Fraternal Order of Police who took offense to the February release of her “Formation” music video and Super Bowl halftime performance. They complained that the song implied that the police actively promote brutality, and that her backup dancers were wearing Black Panther-like costumes. That sprouted the #BoycottBeyoncé campaign online, mostly stirred from within the conservative press.

She pushed back on the criticism in a recent interview with Elle, saying she has “much admiration and respect for officers and the families of officers who sacrifice themselves to keep us safe.” Beyoncé, however, is not above making a dollar (or, in this case, 45) off the social media controversy with T-shirts and cell phone cases emblazoned with the phrase.

Beyoncé has dominated the Internet since last Saturday, when she dropped her album “Lemonade” during an HBO special and sparked more than 4.1 million tweets — and just as many uses of the lemon emoji. Her army of fans, the Beyhive, also stung designer Rachel Roy when the singer implied that she was involved in an extramarital affair with Beyoncé’s husband Jay Z.

More in Marketing

Inside Linda Yaccarino’s first 12-months as X’s CEO

Her bustling week at Cannes Lions on the Côte d’Azur perfectly summed up her tenure so far at X: busy, flashy, but ultimately predictable and elaborate.

As Oracle’s ad business collapses, layoffs and uncertainty ripple through the industry

Whether it’s the privacy issues or its ad division’s poor state, Oracle’s chances of recouping much — if anything — on what it invested are slim. That’s the kind of mark in history CEOs try to avoid at all costs.