Secure your place at the Digiday Publishing Summit in Vail, March 23-25
Lip balm brand EOS is being sued for alleged severe skin reactions, deceptive marketing
EOS, the maker of the recognizable bulb-shaped lip balms, is being sued for causing blistering and other harsh reactions.
Rachael Cronin, the customer who filed the class action lawsuit, claims the lip balm caused her lips to suffer from “severe rashes, dryness, bleeding, blistering, cracking and loss of pigmentation” that lasted for days and even months, according to the lawsuit obtained by Digiday.
EOS, which stands for Evolution of Smooth, has gained notoriety for its social media practices, employing so-called “brand ambassadors” like Jennifer Lopez and Kim Kardashian to talk positively about the lip balm and post with the product on Instagram.
Here’s a recent picture Britney Spears posted on Instagram flaunting the product:

Cronin says that its “viral marketing frenzy” dupes people into thinking it’s an essential item to use.
“The message EOS is trying to mislead consumers about is clear: EOS lip-balm is a daily necessity requiring constant use regardless of the actual condition of your lips to improve your health, diet, and appearance,” the suit states. “In reality, behind the smoke-and-mirrors, EOS is anything but smooth.”
Cronin says she posted pictures on Facebook in December of the harsh skin reaction, leading to a “frenzy of responses” from others who claimed the same thing happened to them and posted pictures, as seen below, of the reaction.

While the lawsuit doesn’t state how much she and the other individuals are suing for, Cronin hopes that EOS engages in a “corrective advertising campaign.”
But fans on Facebook posted to EOS’ page defending the company, writing that they’ve never experienced a problem with the lip balm.
“I have been using these since they came out in 2009, and nothing has happened to my lips. Sounds like people may have shared their eos with someone who has a disease, and now they’re blaming EOS,” wrote a fan.
In a statement, EOS told Digiday said the lawsuit is “without merit,” adding that its “products are made with the highest quality ingredients and meet or exceed all safety and quality standards set out by our industry and validated by rigorous testing conducted by an independent lab.”
More in Marketing
In graphic detail: How Anthropic’s Pentagon refusal is paying off in downloads, brand trust and enterprise deals
OpenAI’s Pentagon deal seemed to spark uproar among its users, many of whom were against it. Anthropic’s refusal to agree to the terms was seen by users as the more trustworthy alternative.
How AI could disrupt retail media’s $38 billion search ad market
ChatGPT and other AI chatbots could divert shoppers from retailer sites, putting the $38B retail search market at risk.
‘Brand safety is moving from fear to curiosity’: Zefr’s Raddon on content-level accreditation – and what it exposes about the industry
The threat is no longer a discrete piece of bad content that a keyword list or a domain block can catch. Its volume.