For a 97-year-old magazine publisher, Forbes is no shrinking violet. It has gone all-in on a platform strategy that’s thrown open its site to 1,200 contributors to post directly their own articles, as well as advertisers under its four-year-old native-ad program.
To its critics, these moves spell the death knell of a storied brand. Columnist Michael Wolff recently called Forbes “an obvious fraud,” adding, “It is not a magazine or editorial operation at all. It is just, in effect, a user comment site that allows commenters the pretense of saying they have written for Forbes.” But to Forbes president and CEO Mike Perlis this is simply the evolution of a nearly 100-year-old startup.
“We think the opposite is true,” Perlis said at the Digiday Publishing Summit in Vail, Colo. “The ability for people to be content creators is so incredibly powerful.”
And yet there are questions about quality. Forbes now boasts an audience of 28 million unique visitors per month, yet to get there it publishes up to 400 articles a day, including up to 10 posts from advertisers under the Forbes BrandVoice program.
“Forbes is very discerning, very picky and very concerned with the quality of the people who become contributors,” Perlis said. “They’re not just extra people coming to the table.”
Forbes has executed this strategy on the back of a homegrown tech platform it built with up to a dozen different components from tech vendors. Called Falcon, the content-management system powers both the Forbes contributor network and its BrandVoice native ad program. Forbes is now in talks to license the platforms to other publishers that want to follow a similar strategy.
“We want to be not just a great media company but also a great technology company,” Perlis said.
See Perlis discuss the Forbes strategy in this five-minute video interview with Digiday executive editor Brian Braiker.
More in Media
From brand deals to equity deals: creators want a stake, not just a fee
The creator economy is moving into a new phase: creators getting into companies at the ground floor through sweat equity or angel investing.
Media Briefing: Publishers question whether personalization actually pays off
Publishers are personalizing newsletters to get more value from readers, but questions remain over whether it’s a meaningful differentiator.
Publishers’ scorecard on Google’s ad tech remedies: they’re progress, but far from a clean win
After years of waiting for the DOJ to finally curb Google’s ad tech power, publishers are finding the devil in these new remedies.