Snapchat is once again being blasted for a skin tone face lens.
Last month it released a Bob Marley lens that many critics likened to digital blackface. This time around, the controversy is over a filter that “whitewashes” the user’s face, smoothing over the skin with a light complexion, bigger eyes and a thinner jaw. Snapchat users have dubbed it the “pretty” filter because it wipes out blemishes, however it has sparked criticism that it’s promoting Eurocentric beauty standards.
Many users were upset, including one who said they’re “very disturbed by the fact that your ‘beautification’ filters make my skin lighter, and my nose and jaw smaller. Just saying.”
Criticisms from others online also echo that sentiment:
why does every snapchat filter try to make me look white?
— tyra banksy (@meganamen) May 15, 2016
Ahhhhh snapchat made my namesake a filter, yasssssssss (but that skin-whitening and face-narrowing ) pic.twitter.com/Lhw8l8vzmy
— TMM (@mangiferin) January 25, 2016
this snapchat filter is the epitome of whitewashing pic.twitter.com/FBpADPtHfa
— shez (@TEENVOCALS) May 8, 2016
On the flip side, others are find this “controversy” to be overstated:
Good lord… Snapchat darkens faces with filters? “BLACKFACE, BURN THEM!” Snapchat lightens faces with filters? “WHITEWASHING, BURN THEM!”
— OMIOTEK (@omiotaco) May 17, 2016
Snapchat defended its Bob Marley lens and declined to pull it, despite pleas from users. The company didn’t immediately respond for comment for this latest controversy.
More in Media
Why brands like Gap Inc. and Staples are inviting their employees to be creators
Companies are scrambling for creators. Turns out they already employ them.
Media Briefing: The case for and against markdown for AI bots
Markdown is becoming publishers’ latest AI optimization tactic, raising questions about the scraping tradeoff.
People Inc. CEO: We’re not turning off Google crawlers yet
People Inc. won’t cut off Google’s AI crawlers yet, citing its continued dependence on Google search traffic even as referrals decline.