Join us Dec. 1-3 in Nashville for the Digiday Programmatic Marketing Summit
Much was made of the second-screen activity around the Super Bowl and its commercial breaks this year, with major brands experimenting with app integrations such as Shazam and IntoNow. But according to in-app analytics firm Flurry, the second screen disrupts TV audiences more than it complements the ads, diverting users’ attention away from both ads and content if they’re failing to hold consumers’ attention. That assertion suggests marketers might be better off trying to reach audiences that are less engaged with the “first screen” rather than those who are more engaged.
Flurry believes that the second screen is still largely more disruptive than complementary. If a consumer is not paying attention to the television program in front of her, she is likely using an application to post social updates or play games. For example, if a Super Bowl ad isn’t holding her interest, playing another round of Words with Friends is a likely activity.
Read the full post on Flurry’s Blog.
More in Media
How a sports betting creator drove 200 million short-form views of his podcast
Zach “Mystic Zach” Hirsch has figured out how to maximize engagement around sports-betting content while staying brand safe.
As publishers await click data, Google’s AI visibility push complicates the opt-out decision
Google is moving on two fronts: working up the U.K’s Competition and Markets Authority-mandated search opt-out publishers have long sought, while enhancing AI Overviews in ways that could make opting out less appealing.
WTF is the AI training opt-out policy token?
Major AI companies are backing a new AI training opt-out standard proposal for publishers, but it exposes deeper tensions over AI scraping.