Why Good Housekeeping Isn’t into Video

Good Housekeeping isn’t exactly looking to become the Hulu of women’s service. But the magazine may have another Web native brand in its sights: Demand Media.

As it plunges forward toward further embracing digital media, its most reverred brand, the 125-year-old Good Housekeeping is undergoing a major Web makeover that will serve as a template for the rest of the magazine company’s sites. The redesign of GoodHousekeeping.com is doubling down on search optimization rather than going for video.
“Video hasn’t been a big element  of the new site, frankly,” said Mark Weinberg, Hearst’s vp of programming and product strategy. “We’re investing in it. But it’s not part of the centerpiece.”
That’s a perhaps counterintuitive position for any traditional to take, given the huge growth in online video consumption and advertising — and the overarching industry perception that video is the future of the Web. But video is hardly at Good Housekeeping’s editorial core. Not to mention that it’s expensive, noted Weinberg.
The new site, which has been built in HTML5, is not without video. The magazine does take advantage of its in house kitchen and testing to labs to produce some instructional materials, such as the clip of Best Truffles for Valentine’s Day. But with its emphasis on service, recipes and product reviews, video may actually serve to slow readers down.
“We’re not trying to be Hulu, but we are trying to be helpful,” said Eric Gillin, group director, Hearst digital media.
Being helpful has been a staple of Good Housekeeping since the turn of the century, not the most recent one either. But it’s a space on the Web that has been encroached upon by the likes of search-driven content juggernauts like Demand Media.
And while Hearst officials never mentioned Demand by name, the company would clearly like to use its vast women’s service content pool to gain some of that traction back. When asked whether search engine optimization was a major focus of the redesign, Weinberg said “Yes, in capital letters.”
At launch, GH.com now features over 1,200 product reviews in 11 categories, the start of a growing database that should help the site rank higher on a variety of Google searches. Included are hundreds of reviews that the magazine conducts that never make it to print — essentially allowing Hearst to better monetize content it’s already paid for.
Goodhousekeeping.com is just the start, as Hearst plans to relaunch many of its 28 Web sites over the next year and a half. “This project forms the basic site structure for all of our brands,” said Weinberg,
So does that mean video is not a priority for Hearst magazines? That remains to be seen, and will probably vary by brand. Case in point, yesterday’s original video clip featured on Cosmopolitan.com: “Would You Do Him Outside?”

More in Media

Illustration of a fire hydrant spraying water with the Facebook logo on the side.

Publishers reckon with declining Facebook referral traffic as the platform pulls away from news

Publishers are still feeling the effects of a change Facebook made in May that caused a steep decline in referral traffic. Nearly four months later, publishers aren’t sure when — or if — that traffic will come back. 

There is a new definition for MFAs, but it’s meant to be open to interpretation

A new definition for MFAs is available but the vague nature of the guidelines is leading to a lack of standards that might prevent adoption.

Publishers weigh generative AI’s pros and cons during the Digiday Publishing Summit

The publishers who attended DPS were focused on the potential upsides of applying the technology to their operations while guarding against the downsides.