Last chance to save on Digiday Publishing Summit passes is February 9
Another day, another ad blocking report is triggering heartburn in publishers and agencies.
The number of people in the U.S. using an ad blocker is expected to balloon to 86.6 million in 2017, according to eMarketer. That’s a staggering increase of 24 percent from this year, where the research company predicts that 69.8 million people will use an ad blocker by the end of 2016.
Active ad blocker use, which eMarketer defines as people who access the internet once a month with the tool, is still more prevalent on desktop browsers rather than on mobile because there are more intrusive ads on desktop’s larger screens, and people tend to spend more time on mobile apps.
“In fact, 90.5 percent of ad blocking users will block ads on desktops and laptops, while just 29.7 percent will do so on smartphones,” the report states, noting that the overlapping number is because some people use an ad blocker on both desktop and on smartphones.
Ad blocking isn’t going away, surmises eMarkerter senior analyst Paul Verna. The news should spur publishers, marketers and agencies that rely on advertising to “deliver compelling ad experiences that consumers won’t want to block,” he said.
If there isn’t a fix, publishers could stand to lose $35 billion in revenue by 2020. The report from eMarketer mirrors that of a recent global study of ad blockers conducted by Reuters, which found that the utility is growing in popularity across the globe.
More in Media
In Graphic Detail: The puny nature of regulatory fines compared to Big Tech’s financial prowess
Big Tech could pay off over $7 billion in 2025 fines in less than one month, demonstrating the disparity between regulatory bite and corporate wealth.
WTF is vibe coding?
Vibe coding is an increasingly popular way of writing code using plain-language prompts that creators are leveraging to build apps, websites, and more.
Google’s forced AI opt out: what changes — and what doesn’t — for publishers
Publishers want the Competition Markets Authority to impose harder structural remedies on Google regarding its AI crawler vs. behavioral ones.