In yesterday’s Wall Street Journal, tech columnist Farhad Manjoo tackled the subject of mobile advertising, concluding that Facebook has shown the monetization problem there is a thing of the past. In fact, mobile ads are now a “boom,” he writes, with top players like Facebook poised for a “windfall.”
The problem is this: Manjoo curiously leaves out publishers like his own, The Wall Street Journal, which continue to struggle with making as much money off mobile ads as they do on desktop. In fact, mobile ad CPMs are the second lowest of any advertising medium.
That discount is a tough pill to swallow when between a third and half of publisher traffic is coming from mobile. Despite eMarketer’s typically bullish mobile ad forecast cited by Manjoo, the reality is the mobile ad market badly trails consumption.
Much of Manjoo’s argument rests on the idea that consumers won’t “rebel” against ads on mobile services. This is a curious argument. Obviously, consumers claim not to like ads. But the choice is paying for services or getting them free with ads. More often than not, history has shown people are more willing to pay with their attention than with their wallets. This isn’t much of a surprise. The cycle by now is well-known. Service introduces ads, some users claim they “suck,” people grow accustomed to them. Highlights at 11.
The bigger issues facing mobile ads aren’t addressed. The mobile ad world has become one of haves and have nots. Manjoo concentrates on the haves, the platforms like Facebook, but the world of publishers isn’t so luckily. The lack of a cookie in mobile is troubling. The advantage shifts in such a situation to those with user log-in data, more often than not — surprise! — the big Silicon Valley platforms. The oligopoly that is Web advertising, which is increasingly dominated by tech platforms rather than content creators, appears ready to tighten its grip.
Publishers are also faced with a dearth of effective ad formats. Facebook’s seen success with its mobile ad formats, such as those driving app installs, but most content publishers are left with dreadful mobile banners. Manjoo’s piece itself has ads from HSBC on the desktop version but none in mobile. The WSJ’s lucky enough to have subscriber revenue so it doesn’t have to rely on the pittance that mobile ads draw. Too bad most publishers don’t have that luxury.
How agencies adapt as bots evolve
Social media bots may represent just a sliver of an app's total users, but it turns out they may be generating more content than we were previously aware. The challenge is separating the good ones from the bad.
Publishers feel the crunch of cookieless browsers like Apple’s Safari
Bid enrichment provides publishers the means of sprucing up their cookieless impressions to improve their value in advertisers’ eyes.
Why Hearst is building a commerce marketplace
Publisher commerce marketplaces aren't always successful, but Hearst's Sheel Shah hopes his company's new marketplace will capitalize on the natural evolution of its readers' online shopping habits.
Sponsored<strong>How marketers are responding to shoppers’ wants this holiday season</strong>
‘Death by a thousand paper cuts’: Publishers fret over alternative ID overload hurting site performance
Publishers lack the data to know which IDs they can afford not to support and are worried a surplus of IDs can slow page-load speeds and lower sites' search rankings.
Member ExclusiveMedia Buying Briefing: Separating agency progress from posturing around carbon reduction and sustainability
Could it be that the media world is finally taking concrete steps toward decarbonization — or will many of the efforts underway become the butt of a joke (or worse, the focus of an upcoming John Oliver segment)?