The news publishers enduring layoffs in the past few days will soon be figuring out how to make do with smaller newsrooms, but some others are years into the process of attempting to publish more efficiently.
In late 2017, Gannett, which laid off at least two dozen reporters Wednesday across multiple titles in the USA Today Network, discovered something that suggested the local news publisher could dramatically reduce the output of its newsrooms without adversely affecting traffic. An internal review that examined the “half-life” of its titles’ digital content led Gannett executives to conclude it could dramatically reduce, or in some cases eliminate, some of the things its reporters were covering. It began testing that hypothesis out in 2018.
Those cuts were billed as a way to help newsrooms focus their finite resources on meatier stories. But they also presaged what’s likely to be a major theme in media in 2019. Cost-cutting is going to drive decisions at every publisher this year, Breitling Replica
and it will likely affect the kinds of content publishers increasingly focus on. In some cases, it may lead to publishers focusing more on the kinds of stories that lead to subscriptions and direct consumer revenue through affiliate links than that which produces the most ad impressions. In others, it will most likely mean abandoning quick-twitch articles designed to ride waves of Facebook traffic — and make money off display ad impressions.
Either way, it will mean publishers producing less. And some might argue that’s good for readers and viewers, who may find themselves clicking on fewer low-value articles and videos. But regardless, it’s bad news for the reporters who are losing their jobs this month, and for those at some other publishers who look set to lose theirs in months to come. — Max Willens
Connected TV’s challenge in winning over TV advertisers
Connected TV platforms, including Amazon, Roku and Samsung, are seizing on advertisers’ ever-growing interest in video that people stream on their big-screen TVs. But they have some work to do if they want to really win over TV advertisers.
Each of those companies is effectively following the digital ad network playbook of aggregating inventory across various publishers’ OTT apps and packaging it up into audience segments for advertisers to buy. That may be fine for digital advertisers that are accustomed to buying ads on Facebook and YouTube and care more about who sees an ad than what content an ad is attached to. But TV advertisers care just as much about the content as the audience and are hesitant to spend money when they don’t have enough transparency into and control over where exactly that money is going.
“What’s holding back the shift in budgets on the TV side is the lack of clearly understanding what content you’re airing in,” Mike Piner, svp of video and data-driven investments at MullenLowe’s Mediahub, said in a recent interview.
That transparency and control is not only important from a brand-safety standpoint, but also for ensuring that advertisers are not wasting their money. If they are looking to reach 25- to 34-year-old cord-cutting moms, they may not want to reach those viewers when they’re watching a collection of user-generated videos. Additionally they probably want to make sure that they’re not buying the same inventory from Amazon or Roku that they are getting directly from streaming video services like Sling TV or Pluto TV, leading to situations where someone might see back-to-back ads from the same brand.
Of course, connected TV aggregators don’t have to improve the transparency and control they offer. Breitling Replica Watches TV ad dollars will still flow into the market; they just might flow directly to the publishers instead of through the aggregators.
“The best way to control is to go direct. Once you start going through the [aggregators], you lose transparency,” said Tracey Scheppach, CEO and co-founder of Matter More Media, an agency that specializes in targeted TV and digital video advertising. — Tim Peterson займ по смс через интернет срочно
Media Briefing: The case for and against monthly and annual subscriptions in the battle for retention
There are no one-size-fits-all solutions for improving retention in a subscriptions business. While annual subscribers might stick around longer for some, other publishers will have better luck with monthly plans.
Digiday+ Research: The economy will hit the media and marketing industries this year, but differently
The economy will plague both the media and marketing industries in 2023, but the hit will be uneven between publishers and agencies.
Podcast ad buyers have yet to see a slowdown
Ad buyers have yet to see clients cut their podcast budgets – though the time of podcasts as the shiny new medium may be coming to an end.
SponsoredWhy Best Buy Ads sees retail media as integral to its customer-centric purpose
Sponsored by Best Buy Ads Retail media networks have become critical for marketers, with retailers investing in ways that enable advertisers to engage consumers across online and offline channels. Given the wealth of retailers’ first-party customer data and measurement capabilities, retail media networks have become a natural fit for augmenting performance marketing programs. Alongside the […]
The programmatic open marketplace is faltering, but publishers see a bright spot in private programmatic deals
Publishers are coming to terms with their open programmatic marketplace RPMs being 20-55% lower than they were this time last year, but the hope is that programmatic guaranteed deals will make up the deficit.
Atlas Obscura wants to be profitable before raising funds in a tricky media market
Atlas Obscura wants to turn a profit this year before it raises another funding round, at a time when publishers are facing lower valuations and pickier investors as deal activity slows.