As Twitter prepares to go public on Thursday, research firm Forrester is questioning the value marketers get from the platform.
According to a new survey and associated report penned by Forrester analyst Nate Elliot, only 55 percent of Twitter marketers say they’re “satisfied with the business value they achieve” from the platform. Apparently that’s low compared to other established online marketing channels like search, email, mobile, and online display.
“Twitter’s success as a Marketing channel is not yet guaranteed,” the Twitter report, released Tuesday says. “Twitter’s devoted user base and broad mainstream awareness have given it the opportunity to court marketers. But the company’s viability as a marketing channel has yet to be proven.”
Twitter has two major problems when it comes to serving marketers, according to Elliot. First, the social network is failing to prove the value of its offerings with hard metrics. It needs to develop new tools and advice to help marketers get the most out of its platform, he said, because 44 percent of the marketers Forrester surveyed said they’re satisfied with Twitter as a partner.
But perhaps more importantly, Elliot said Twitter lacks the scale that some marketers assume it offers. The company might boast 230 million active users, but many users have multiple accounts, and many accounts are created for corporate use.
“When they do the math, most marketers will find that Twitter offers them a chance to reach tens of millions rather than hundreds of millions of people,” Elliot wrote.
The good news, however, is that Facebook’s focus on selling ads could present Twitter with an opportunity to help marketers connect with their existing audiences, the report added. In other words, it could do more than just sell marketers ads, it could provide them with better opportunities to interact with consumers “organically.”
“If Twitter can create genuine connections between companies and their customers, it stands to benefit from the enormous market opportunity that Facebook has left behind,” the report reads. The problem is that’s often harder to monetize than simply slapping ads on the site, as evidenced by the fact Facebook and Twitter have both opted to slap ads on their sites.
The report was based on a survey of 395 marketers from companies based in the U.S., Canada and the United Kingdom with $500 million or more in annual revenue, conducted in August.
Twitter did not immediately respond to requests for comment, but told Digiday earlier this year that it’s seeing growing interest from marketers both in the U.S. and abroad.
4A’s Marla Kaplowitz on 3 ways agencies can navigate the uncertain economy
The industry trade group is helping many agency members prepare their business for broader economic changes, from how to retain talent to honing their financial acumen.
How sportsbooks and publishers are rethinking the terms of content-based sponsorships
The economic slowdown is causing sportsbooks and publishers alike to reconsider their approaches to content-based customer acquisition campaigns.
A year after coming under Axel Springer’s control, Politico’s Europe and North American businesses are closer than ever
Politico is still realizing what a global brand might look like, but Politico EU's CRO Nicolas Sennegon is already pursuing an advertising business that extends across the pond.
SponsoredHow FAST channels are redefining primetime opportunities for advertisers
Sponsored by Vevo With the competition from content providers continuing to build, the traditional primetime TV slots are no longer guaranteeing the mass audiences they once did. Television viewership is evolving, and the primetime window of 8–11 p.m. is less broadly reflective of younger audiences’ content consumption habits. In 2022, attracting TV viewers is a […]
How publishers can prevent cyberattacks after Fast Company’s hack
Tech executives shared what publishers can do to prevent getting hacked and avoid cybersecurity breaches.
Media employees face no consequences for ignoring return-to-office requests — yet
Employees and union members at a number of media companies had not heard of anyone facing disciplinary actions for continuing to work from home.