Join us Sept. 24 in NYC to connect with execs from Digitas, Claire's, Marriott, Havas and others
The search-optimization era was defined by the number of publishers that wrote stories in cynical traffic ploys on subjects like what time the Super Bowl starts. Now that we’re in the social age, however, the tactic of choice is the linkbait headline.
Pioneered by BuzzFeed, and possibly perfected by Upworthy, clickbait is a modern-day media scourge, as unbecoming as it is irresistible. Many of us lament it, still more can’t resist its siren call.
For the trio behind social startup CentUp, clickbait headlines have simply gone too far, to the point where they are a parody of themselves. To prove the point, they’ve created Headlines Against Humanity, a simple site that invites you, dear reader, to guess which of these headlines is real.
OK, how about these two?
(You’ll have to visit Headlines Against Humanity for the answers.)
Tyler Travitz, who created Headlines Against Humanity with fellow CentUp co-founders Len Kendall and John Geletka, explained to Digiday the rationale behind the site.
What’s your beef with clickbait? It wouldn’t exist if people didn’t respond.
It’s not a “beef” per se. It’s a commentary on the state of journalism. The current primary business models focus on advertising and that incentivizes publishers to focus on clicks because that’s what brings in the dollars. (As opposed to say catering to subscribers who care more about the quality of content). This isn’t new. What is new is the trend toward sensational headlines just to get people to view the page. We find this trend a bit unsettling because most times, the bite isn’t as good as the bait, thus your time is wasted.
Is social media making it worse?
Social media can often fuel narcissism. Sometimes it’s in the form of selfies but sometimes it’s through finding shareable content and getting lots of likes and shares. Lots of publishers have discovered that all they need is a create sticky headlines that give people social ammunition, regardless of whether that content is actually educational/relevant/accurate.
Won’t its effectiveness as a tactic inevitably decline? We’ve been down this road with other optimization tactics.
Headlines Against Humanity isn’t the first parody of this tactic so clearly people are starting to connect the dots. People in the media industry definitely are aware of this very methodical approach to headlines, but the masses still are sharing more of these links than ever. As more sites try to copy this tactic, it will likely lead to reduced effectiveness.
What’s the one headline that you remember hating the most?
His First 4 Sentences Are Interesting. The 5th Blew My Mind. And Made Me A Little Sick.
More in Media
How Semafor is redefining the head of video role
As Semafor’s head of video, Adam Banicki sits at the intersection of the newsroom and the commercial team, reporting to the editor-in-chief with a dotted line to the revenue side.
Comscore data shows how AI discovery is splintering beyond ChatGPT
Comscore data shows ChatGPT losing ground to Gemini and Claude as AI citations emerge as a key visibility metric for publishers and brands.
Paywall violation ‘eviscerates’ fair use defense: What OpenAI-NYT twist means for publishers
For publishers, the newly unsealed material doesn’t just bolster their legal case; it validates years of frustration over how their work has been treated.