Can AOL Grab TV Dollars Through

With its purchase of yesterday, AOL upped its investment in the advertising technology arena significantly. But ultimately the purchase isn’t about squeezing more dollars from digital ad budgets, executives said. Long term, it’s about positioning AOL in a place where it can tap into TV dollars.

Yesterday AOL CEO Tim Armstrong repeatedly stressed his desire to “capitalize on the shift” from traditional television to online. The acquisition, he said, will help.

“We think there will be a significant opportunity in the TV space as traditional TV moves to the Internet,” he told Digiday. “We believe programmatic video will be a decade-long opportunity.”

It’s telling, too, that will not be housed along with AOL’s other ad tech assets under its Networks division, now run by former Razorfish CEO Bob Lord. It’ll live instead in a separate video unit, managed by video SVP Ran Harnevo. That division is squarely about video. With video syndicator 5min and a wealth of video of its own, AOL can now go to mid-tier publishers with a nice story: Run videos on your site, along with the ads supplied through, and you’ll get higher CPMs than your regular display ads, which are mostly fetching bargain prices.

“We’re seeing the move of TV dollars into the Web, and at the same time, we’re seeing the move from manual to programmatic buying,” Harnevo said. “This will help us capitalize on both.”

Is this wishful thinking? Perhaps. After all, the shift of TV dollars to the Web is predicted as often as the Year of Mobile. TV remains the giant with brands, and the online video industry is a mere speck in comparison. According to eMarketer, U.S. online video advertising will be a $4 billion industry this year. TV will be 17 times as large, clearing 68 billion. itself is rather small, with industry watcher putting its 2012 revenue at $85 million. And the market for online video itself is of dubious size,’s Dan Rayburn points out. “People have been making a lot of predictions about the size and growth of the online video ad market, but the truth is, the market has simply not grown as fast as some want to imply,” he wrote.

Dave Morgan, a former top AOL executive and current CEO of TV ad targeter Simulmedia also cast doubt on the TV ad money spin.

“It’s a good move for AOL, though I don’t think that it gets them TV money,” he said in an email. “Web video as its category is growing fast and will be sucking money out of display and print, so AOL needs a scaled offering if it is going to participate in that market as it grows from $3-4 billion a year to $6-7 billion over the next few years. They need a company and tech to aggregate and monetize video inventory beyond what they have of their own, so should be able to give them that.

“Agencies, too, are preparing for a shift in the way they buy video advertising. Historically, it’s been digital teams that bought online video ads, but that’s beginning to change. Increasingly, agencies are organizing and training their teams to buy both TV and online. It’s becoming more centralized, they say. It’s that trend that AOL is hoping to capitalize on, since TV budgets typically remain considerably larger than those allocated to online video.”

“Right now, is really Web video,” said David Smith, CEO of media agency MediaSmith, though he acknowledged that the company might provide AOL with “a good platform” to extend into targeted or “addressable” TV ads.

According to AOL, that’s specifically why it chose over the other video-related ad tech options in the market. AOL was evaluating potential acquisition targets for over a year, Armstrong said, but felt others in the market, such as YuMe and Tremor Media, relied too heavily on a typical ad network and media arbitrage approach. brought the most robust technology to the table, he said. Coincidentally, YuMe issued an IPO at $9 a share yesterday, lower than the $12 it had previously hoped.

Harnevo stressed that wasn’t acquired to help AOL sell its own inventory, either. Rather, it plans to sell it to third parties strictly as a pure technology offering. What’s more, it believes firmly that programmatic trading won’t have the same downward pressure on pricing in video as it has in display, thanks largely to the scarcity of video ad inventory, and tools such as private marketplaces which provides.

“We believe this type of technology will power both premium and non-premium,” he said. “The technology itself doesn’t affect the pricing; the supply does.”

More in Media

daily newsstand

Media Briefing: Why some publishers are resurrecting their print magazines

Nylon and Complex are bringing back print, but see more opportunity than just pure ad revenue.

Publisher strategies: Condé Nast, Forbes, The Atlantic, The Guardian and The Independent on key revenue trends

Digiday recently spoke with executives at Condé Nast, Forbes, The Atlantic, The Guardian and The Independent about their current revenue strategies for our two-part series on how publishers are optimizing revenue streams. In this second installment, we highlight their thoughts on affiliate commerce, diversification of revenue streams and global business expansion.

How sending fewer emails and content previews improved The New Yorker’s newsletter engagement

The New Yorker is sending newsletters less frequently and giving paid subscribers early access to content in their inboxes in an effort to retain its cohort of 1.2 million paid subscribers and grow its audience beyond that.