Join us Dec. 1-3 in Nashville for the Digiday Programmatic Marketing Summit
We all subtweet, but Twitter wants to take ownership of it.
The social network has filed papers to trademark the word “subtweet,” according to a Oct. 30 filing first noticed by Politico media editor Alex Weprin. For those unfamiliar with subtweeting, it’s when a Twitter user shades another without explicitly stating their name or handle. It’s the modern equivalent of talking behind a person’s back.
The term, used since at least 2013, is a quirk within the community and has spawned explainers, memes and think pieces.
It’s even made its way into the mainstream as a way to describe someone calling out another person without naming them, as seen in this recent Washington Post story titled “Bernie Sanders’s speech Saturday was one long subtweet of Hillary Clinton,” even though it didn’t happen on Twitter.
“When you need to protect your namespace from people who would misuse it. #keepingit100,” a Twitter spokesman told Digiday.
It’s likely that Twitter doesn’t plan to do anything with it; rather it’s seeking protection for it so rival social networks can’t hijack it. In the past, Twitter has filed a trademark for the words tweetstorm, tweet, retweet and hashflag, also to protect their identity. (They were successful with hashflag; the others are still under review.)
More in Media
People Inc. is building custom APIs to make its journalism easier for AI agents to use
People Inc. is moving toward custom APIs for AI systems, Forbes has adopted Markdown for agents, while the FT, Daily Mail are considering how agents could reach content for subscribers.
Giggly Squad’s SiriusXM deal signals a shift from podcast networks to creator ecosystems
The Giggly Squad deal shows podcasts have turned another corner. Video, short-form, IRL shows…where does the podcast go from here?
The Times of London is gearing up to test ‘macro payments’
The Times has a plan for readers who don’t want to subscribe.