Washington Post tests Amazon ‘buy-it now’ link in articles

The Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post made an inadvertent move into commerce with a “buy it now” button appearing in an Aug. 15 article about a Charlie and the Chocolate Factory controversy.

Readers quickly concluded that since the Amazon founder bought the ailing paper a year ago, he has started using the paper to drive sales of products on the online retail juggernaut. The link was subsequently removed. Here’s what it looked like:

A spokeswoman for the Post, however, said the paper has been embedding buy-it now links in articles “for many years” and that they haven’t been used more widely under Bezos. She said the buttons are added by the copy desk, so the writers and editors who worked on the story are not involved.

As for why the button no longer appeared in the Aug. 15 article, she explained that the in-article button functionality was a mistake. The button was dropped when the Post recently introduced a new article format, then unintentionally added back in a way that put the links into the text instead of on the side.

“It was not intentional,” she said. “And yes, the button is being fixed and will go back on the side where it has always been.”

Buy it now links remain in other reviews and even news articles and comments, as Pando pointed out, like in this Aug. 15 music book review and back to this January 2013 letter to the editor.

Other publishers, including Gawker and Hearst Magazines, have been inserting such buy-now links on their sites for years. The use of the tactic in the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory article was particularly creepy, though, because the article dealt with the controversy about the book’s new cover that featured a sexualized young girl, presumably one of the book’s characters.

In-line advertising has been around for years, too, with providers like Vibrant Media turning keyword links in articles into ads.

Newspaper publishers are pressured to find new sources of revenue, even if it’s just a tiny portion of affiliate revenue from sales, but the risk is in compromising editorial independence (or appearing to do so) and turning off readers in the process, as comments on this article showed.

Screen shot 2014-08-17 at 12.50.46 PM

Screen shot 2014-08-17 at 12.51.31 PM

Screen shot 2014-08-17 at 12.51.58 PM

If the buy-it now button is gone, the Post is still serving Amazon ads in the right rail for packaged goods with the tagline, “shop now.” (And, of course, those ubiquitous Google AdSense units.)

https://digiday.com/?p=84377

More in Media

Media Briefing: Publishers search for new ways to grow (and authenticate) audiences, overheard at the Digiday Publishing Summit

“[Advertisers] already pay data providers for data. So why not pay the publisher?”

Research Briefing: Publishers’ revenue sources are top of mind at Digiday Publishing Summit

In this week’s Digiday+ Research Briefing, we examine which revenue streams were top of mind for publishers at the Digiday Publishing Summit, how TikTok is getting even more marketing spend from brands and retailers despite facing a potential U.S. ban, and how Disney is rolling out DRAX Direct, a direct integration with the industry’s largest DSPs, as seen in recent data from Digiday+ Research.

How Forbes is testing its SSPs to improve programmatic ad revenue

Forbes has been running tests with its SSPs to improve the ad tech firms’ contributions to the publisher’s revenue.