Last week, Domino’s stepped in it on Facebook. A customer took to the brand’s Facebook page to compliment the chain, which then responded with a rote “Sorry for your bad experience” response. Digiday, along with others, covered the snafu, which appeared to point out the perils of relying on automated responses in social media.
#SocialMedia boo boo by Dominos shows the importance of managing the conversation using real people. https://t.co/RfgmZRC6We
— Dan Kim (@umichdan) August 13, 2013
And yet the error was actually a mistake made by a human, according to Domino’s. In much the same way as Bank of America screwed up last month by having a social media team sounding a lot like robots, a Domino’s employee mistook the compliment for a complaint. The employee then, it would appear, gave the default response for social media complaints. Domino’s, to its credit, tried to regain its footing by taking it in stride. The rub with brands in social media is that they’ll need humans, who are prone to make mistakes.
@dominos @Digiday @MeaganSGuidry I agree with you & feel Dominos did a good job today owning up to it. And the pizza they make now is great.
— Alex Ramati (@TheAustinDawg) August 13, 2013
The mistake, it would seem, was not acting human in the first place. Domino’s clearly has a set protocol for dealing with customer complaints. The human error was enacting that protocol. It’s similar to how call centers often rely on scripts. That can help in consistency but, as brands like Zappos have shown, throwing away the scripts for real human interaction can win over more people.
If the corp social response sounds automated, the essence of the channel is lost: Domino’s Facebook Fail https://t.co/U3qd0r6a26 via @digiday
— cheryl nolan (@cnolan01) August 13, 2013
The moral of the story is social media will continue to rely on humans. Some things can be automated, but the best policy for brands is probably to give its people leeway to, well, act like people.
More in Marketing
Why the New York Times is forging connections with gamers as it diversifies its audience
The New York Times is not becoming a gaming company. But as it continues to diversify its editorial offerings for the digital era, the Times has embraced puzzle gamers as one of its core captive audiences, and it is taking ample advantage of its advantageous positioning in the space in 2024.
Why B2B marketers are advertising more like consumer brands to break through a crowded marketplace
Today’s marketing landscape is more fragmented than ever. Like consumer brands, business brands are looking to stand out in a crowded and competitive marketplace, making marketing tactics like streaming ads, influencers and humorous spots more appealing.
As draft puts WNBA in spotlight, the NBA is speeding up ballplayers’ transition to creators
The NBA’s star athletes are its greatest marketing asset.