This week the advertising world takes over Manhattan for Advertising Week. Digiday editors are moderating several sessions during the week. We will also cover the highlights, lowlights and key personalities. Our coverage is made possible by Specific Media.
For all the talk of following audiences wherever they are, major brands are still sensitive about where they appear. That’s why those promising “family-friendly” environments end up doing well.
A study of six $1 billion brands found that there was a significant increase in purchase intent based on where and how an ad was placed, in addition to how the consumer perceived the advertiser, noted Ben Simon, director of corporate strategy at Walmart. In some instances, it would actually have been better to have not run an ad at all than to have run it in a so-called toxic environment.
As the speakers of the session, “Content is Kin: The Power of Family Stories,” pointed out, consumers don’t necessarily connect the producer of a given show to its content, but they do relate the ads to the show, believing whatever brands advertise during this period support the show’s content.
“There’s been a real transformation in how we are talking about family-friendly programming. For a long time the definition had negative connotations so the perception in the creative community was that it wasn’t of great quality, that it was cheesy and sub-par,” said Simon.
Quality is certainly at play here, as Simon pointed out. “It can’t all be cheap and low-cost. Quality has an impact on messaging and how it impacts your consumers.”
Gail Tifford, senior director of media for North America at Unilever, argued that, in fact, family-friendly programming can be cool, relevant, entertaining and appropriate — if done correctly.
But as the definition of family has changed, so too have viewing habits; families no longer only sit around the TV set. That being said, though video is usually the first dollar allocation in the media mix, Walmart is “distribution-agnostic,” noted Simon, whose goal is to be consumer-centric and relevant, no matter the platform.
“The [quality] standards might not change, but it’s how it’s executed — maybe it’s snackable content,” said Tifford. “In terms of the tenets of family programming — that will stay the same.”
More in Marketing
WTF is the CMA — the Competition and Markets Authority
Why does the CMA’s opinion on Google’s Privacy Sandbox matter so much? Stick around to uncover why.
Marketing Briefing: How the ‘proliferation of boycotting’ has marketers working understand the real harm of brand blockades
While the reasons for the boycotts vary, there’s a recognition among marketers now that a brand boycott could happen regardless of their efforts – and for reasons outside of marketing and advertising – that will need to be dealt with.
Temu’s ad blitz exposes DTC turmoil: decoding the turbulent terrain
DTC marketers are pointing fingers at Temu, attributing the sharp surge in advertising costs across Meta’s ad platforms to its ad dollars.